UI Design · Branding · Web · Freelance

Increasing user contact rates with a website redesign for S+C Partners

S+C Partners website redesign screens

Overview

Delivered brand strengthening and UX improvements as a freelance collaborator on a website redesign for S+C Partners, a chartered professional accountants firm.

While freelancing for Collective Experience, I collaborated on a website redesign for their client, S+C Partners, a chartered professional accountants firm.

My role involved strengthening their brand and solving for areas of improvement identified by the team's research.

How might we design the client's website so users effortlessly discover and choose the services that best fit their needs, prompting them to convert into customers?

Discovery

Understanding user research

I reviewed the team's research outcomes to understand the redesign's requirements, target audiences, business goals, competitive advantages, and key focus areas. The team had conducted:

Discovery workshops

To align stakeholders on project plans, milestones, goals, and requirements.

User personas

To help the team and client understand their key audiences, user priorities, and user goals.

Competitive analysis

To understand the market landscape, competitive strengths & weaknesses, and opportunities.

Journey map

To foster empathy amongst stakeholders by mapping out the experience and users' thoughts, feelings, priorities, and touchpoints.

Old SC Partners website

Key insights

High net-worth (HNW) clients

Target audiences included entrepreneurs and private corporations in sectors like construction, manufacturing, and distribution.

Most sought-after services

Financial advisory, tax minimization, profitability optimization, and managing financial commitments were the top priorities for users.

Low findability and readability

Hard to find information and low task completion rates stemmed from cluttered navigation, lack of mobile-friendliness, and poor readability.

Weaker business presence

Users did not perceive the firm as a distinct or competitive option compared to competitors offering similar services.

Define

Information architecture analysis

To understand the old website's navigation, I analyzed its information architecture using a sitemap. We learned that the website had significant structural problems, and used competitive prioritization to define what to fix.

Excessive navigation depth

The site's primary navigation was overly complex, often running 4–6 levels deep with additional in-page secondary and tertiary navigation.

Hidden content

Many pages were unlisted in the main navigation, accessible only through links buried within the body copy.

Competitive prioritization

We conducted affinity mapping of the site's topics into categorical clouds, evolving these into a new sitemap to identify and extract the most valued categories.

SC Partners sitemap

Define

Branding opportunities

S+C Partners also needed a complete set of branding guidelines to resolve inconsistencies in their marketing collateral and website, and to build a stronger visual representation of their brand. Agreeing to resolve this first, we consolidated everything we learned into a brand identity set through a process of brainstorms, visual references, mood boards, client touchpoints, and collateral mockups.

SC Partners branding styles

Ideation

Ideation of pages

Once S+C Partners approved the final branding, I conceptualized the website pages, progressing from lo-fi wireframes and design reviews to hi-fidelity prototypes.

SC Partners ideation process

Design

Refinements

These are some examples of changes applied after testing during the refinement stages.

Before

Before — comparison 1

Users found the opening vague, unclear about S+C Partners' identity. The four key services were also not obviously clickable.

After

After — comparison 1

I worked with the content writer to state S+C Partners' purpose, converted the four key services into prominent buttons, and moved critical text above the fold to encourage scrolling.

Before

Before — comparison 2

Users noted a disconnect between photography and page content, and found it difficult to identify individuals or know whom to consult.

After

After — comparison 2

I reduced decorative photography, added individual qualifications, and used clear visual indicators to highlight clickable profiles for each person.

Before

Before — comparison 3

Users found the copy too small. S+C Partners also wanted to upsell their services and increase client contact.

After

After — comparison 3

I added icons to accompanying text for improved readability. To increase client contact, I added an "Ready to get in touch?" section to the bottom of pages with a "Contact us" CTA.

Design

Final solution

Final solution 1 Final solution 2 Final solution 3 Final solution 4

Design

Mobile solution

Mobile solution

Design

Style guide

Style guide

Development

Development specs doc

As a best practice at the agency, I created a specifications document for our external developers. These docs detailed page types, layout, color guides, and font specifications for both web and mobile. Doing so significantly improved our collaboration during development, since developers had a shared reference to use as they began their work.

Development specs doc

Development

Design QA

Once the development agency provided staging links, I assisted with auditing accessibility compliance, from alt tags to font sizing and colour contrast. Any feedback was left for developers to achieve design accuracy.

Impact

Final outcomes

The outcome was a clean, modern, AODA-compliant website with significantly improved findability, readability, accessibility, and brand presence. S+C Partners also gained a new set of branding guidelines to use going forward for all their visual and digital needs, which they are still using today.